THEO SIMON
I agree with the GPTU Group that it would be ridiculous to get rid of the TULO post, and a huge political and tactical mistake. I am relieved that there has been a stay of execution in this regard. Our connection with organised Labour has probably never been more important to build on than it is now, as I believe will become apparent over the coming months.
If elected TULO on GPEX I intend to prove the indispensable value of
this post. I believe that raising TU work to a high profile within the
party will put to bed any plans to sideline organised labour from our struggle
for a Just Transition to a sustainable world. The workplace is where most
of us, because we have no other option, reproduce the ecocidal system everyday,
and organising around green ideas in the workplace is the only way will end
that cycle now, in the timescale necessary. It's also the only place where we
can drive through and maintain the improvements in working class life which
will be massively under attack in the unfolding economic crisis. We
literally need the unions to defend Green Party members, most of whom are
workers too.
It's a sign of how urgently we need to raise union awareness within the
party that this could even be contemplated. As TULO I would work for
branches to align locally with organised workers to create a network of green
union solidarity, and promote the Just Transition message wherever and whenever
possible. It's hugely significant that last July the Cammell Laird
shipyard workers occupation raised the call for nationalisation and a Just
Transition. The GP should have been there supporting them. There
will be more calls like this in the future I'm certain. I think we'll find
we're pushing at an open door, if we are prepared to leave our comfort zone and
engage with the daily reality of people's workplace struggles and the rapidly
increasing membership base of our unions.
HANNAH GRAHAM
I realise this reorganisation is part of the ongoing Green Party Holistic Review process, which I strongly oppose. When the Holistic Review was first proposed, I was Young Greens Co-Chair. I share exactly the same concerns as you about representation on the new bodies, because Young Greens and other bodies in the party also face the threat of having roles removed on the new structures.
At
every point possible (whether this be on GPEx, at various Conferences or on my
personal social media), I have condemned the acts of the Holistic Review, and
voted against it.
On
the Trade Union Liaison Officer (TULO) post, I absolutely agree with you. It is
a serious mistake by the GPEW to ignore the concerns and voices of our members
and supporters in Trade Unions, but also to the wider Trade Union membership
(6.3 million people) as a whole.
I
personally think it reinforces the white, middle-class stereotype that the
party quite rightly is branded with often. The vast majority of members of
Trade Unions are working-class and are often workers from blue-collar
professions, labourers and emergency services. The Green Party should be the
party that stands up for the marginalised and the oppressed: this includes all
groups, and not just a select few.
If
elected as Campaigns Co-ordinator, I would continue my record of campaigning
hard against the Holistic Review, but if the inevitable happens, I will carry
on advocating for the inclusion of posts that represent groups in the party:
TULO is one of the biggest priorities to retain.
Please feel free to get in touch further to clarify any of my answers or
to ask further questions.
I realise this reorganisation is part of the ongoing Green Party Holistic Review process, which I strongly oppose. When the Holistic Review was first proposed, I was Young Greens Co-Chair. I share exactly the same concerns as you about representation on the new bodies, because Young Greens and other bodies in the party also face the threat of having roles removed on the new structures.
At
every point possible (whether this be on GPEx, at various Conferences or on my
personal social media), I have condemned the acts of the Holistic Review, and
voted against it.
On
the Trade Union Liaison Officer (TULO) post, I absolutely agree with you. It is
a serious mistake by the GPEW to ignore the concerns and voices of our members
and supporters in Trade Unions, but also to the wider Trade Union membership
(6.3 million people) as a whole.
I
personally think it reinforces the white, middle-class stereotype that the
party quite rightly is branded with often. The vast majority of members of
Trade Unions are working-class and are often workers from blue-collar
professions, labourers and emergency services. The Green Party should be the
party that stands up for the marginalised and the oppressed: this includes all
groups, and not just a select few.
If
elected as Campaigns Co-ordinator, I would continue my record of campaigning
hard against the Holistic Review, but if the inevitable happens, I will carry
on advocating for the inclusion of posts that represent groups in the party:
TULO is one of the biggest priorities to retain.
Please feel free to get in touch further to clarify any of my answers or
to ask further questions.
MICK GREGG
Perhaps i should, but i didn't actually know
this was being proposed. Where is this information please? I can see no
reason why this role should not be continued. There's plenty of room at the
table for many various groups to be represented
BOB BEGGS
The job I'm applying for in the Policy
Development Committee deliberately requires a completely neutral view in
respect of current and proposed policies. It also has no input to
Constitutional changes except where they directly impact on the effectveness of
the committee. Subsequently I don't think answering your question would be a
useful indicator of my suitability for the role.
ADRIAN SPURRELL
I wasn’t aware that this was being considered.
If it is being considered I think it would be important to understand
the rationale behind that idea.
And then understand what impact not having the role would or wouldn’t have
on our relationship with Trade Unions – if for example someone was going to
pick up the work involved.
At the end of the day having a positive and constructive relationships
with Trade Unions is indeed important. We then need to understand how
best that is achieved
MATT RC BROWNE AND FLORENCE POLLOCK
Florence and I are both trade unionists and support the
retention of a Trade Union Liaison Officer into the new
governance arrangements. As your question sets out, it is essential that
the Green Party retains strong links with the trade union movement.
If elected to the Management Coordinator role we would work closely with
the Green Party Trade Union Group. One of our policy
proposals is to ensure that the Green Party staff trade union is
given a seat in all GPEx, AFCOM and staff management meetings, to embed trade unionism
in the Green Party's own practices.
BENJAMIN SMITH and ASHLEY ROUTH
GPEW should not be removing the role of Trade Union Liaison Officer. Now more than ever in the post covid society, Trade Unions will be vital in our fight for a fair transition to a zero carbon economy.
We think it is a mistake to do so yes. We're both supporters of Trade
Unions and I (Ben) especially have done a lot of work with my respective Trade
Union. We should be fighting for the rights of all workers to organise.
No, as we said in our earlier answer we are supportive of Trade Unions.
We will object to the removal of the position and explore how we can
stop it happening. We will work with the GPTU on matters pertinent to it,
championing the work of it;s members and encouraging more members to approach,
work with, and join their Trade Unions.
DAVID CARLYON
I support the retention of the Green Party Trade Union Liaison Officer post. I believe that the role will play a key part in promoting and enhancing the campaign to deliver a national Green New Deal. In order to secure the support of workers and professions throughout the country, it will be very important to strengthen bonds with trade unions in order to represent how our approach and policies can deliver safe, secure and skilled jobs. As an environmental political party, strong links with trade unions will be required when transitioning from environmentally-damaging industries, to new opportunities and jobs focusing on energy efficiency, retrofitting properties and renewable energy generation etc. I will support policy proposals to help achieve these goals.
·
EWAN JONES
At a higher level, my concern is with the whole of the proposed new Constitutional structure that the Holistic Review / ’Transition Team’ have been attempting to force through Green Party Conference for the past three years.
Their proposal is to further centralise almost all power in a small
unelected Board of appointees, who would line-manage Party Staff, while merging
our current Executive and Green Party Regional Council (GPRC) into a neutered
45-Member Council that would effectively become a ’talking shop’, only able to
operate through Staff-led ’Task and Finish’ groups.
This is no way to run the democratic and effective Green Party that
Britain is crying out for amid the triple global ecological emergencies
of Climate, Social Justice, and Democracy. I have been on record speaking
against these dangers at various Conferences, especially Bristol in Autumn
2018.
The urgent need for a Just Transition, and ever-greater economic
uncertainty, of course makes the Trade Union Liaison role ever more important.
As GPEx Chair, I will fight to ensure that our Members retain democratic
control of our Party, and that we build stronger rather than weaker
relationships with Trade Unions and all working people.
ALICE HUBBARD AND SAM MURRAY
We are both proud trade unionists who believe that you cannot have climate justice without social justice. Trade unions are vital to ensuring a just and equitable transition,giving voices to workers during what will be monumental change. We both strongly believe the green party should keep the Trade Union Liaison Officer post as we need that connection to the trade unions. If anything, we feel it has been vastly underused in our wider plans for change. The TULO should be a resource through which unions are brought to the table to discuss the impacts of particular policies on working practices and provide evidence based approaches to ensure workers are not inhibited by change. The TULO should also be a vessel through which to promote positive policies we have that would change workers’ lives. We also believe that the TULO should have a seat on the GPEW Administration and Finance Committee (AfCom) to be able to actively contribute to recommendations on the financial and HR strategies of the GPEW and ensure that these are in line with the interests of members, employees and other stakeholders.
In terms of keeping the TULO post we are ready and willing to vote on
any measure that would protect TULO. This would have to come through conference
and we wouldn’t hesitate to support this motion and if required help draft it.
The impact of losing TULO was not properly assessed through the holistic review
so the next opportunity will most likely be amending the newly proposed
constitution. We are in a similar situation in that neither the International
Coordinator, nor the International Committee would exist after the holistic
review. This will have a damaging impact as international green relations
require consistent and regular engagement. There has been a proposal to replace
the International Committee with a task and finish group but we do not feel
this recognises the constant developing nature of international work and would
hope the GPTU and others would support us in maintaining at least the
International Committee. We are also concerned about the loss representation of the Young Greens
Co-Chair following holistic review changes, which we believe is essential for
any democratic political party. We are keen to work with the Young Greens and
TULO to ensure that this representation is maintained at executive levels.
Sam is a member of the TUC Young Workers forum representing the
Musicians’ Union and has long campaigned within the MU to adopt UBI. He
recently helped Amelia Womack in her campaign to call on UBI to benefit the
arts sector. Amelia managed to bring the Musicians’ Union on board for the
first time which shows a remarkable shift in union policy. Unions like the MU
and Equity are probably better suited to the Greens than the Labour party these
days but there are certain policies such as those on copyright which prohibit
such alliances, with TULO we could reach out to these unions discuss these
policy concerns and look to inform and review our own policies.
From an international perspective many green parties across the world
are developing stronger relationships with trade unions. At the last European
Green Party council we worked on a resolution about gig workers and protecting
freelancers, adding crucial amendments to protect parental rights, ensure
freelancers have access to equalities protections and to empower gig workers to
be unionised amongst other key protections. We know the green parties in Sweden
and the Netherlands, for example, actively engage trade unions in their work
and we should learn their lessons on how to do the same.
We would be keen to develop a relationship with GPTU so that we can work
on key policy developments regarding workers rights. It would be great if the
group could review policy and suggest amendments where needed for resolutions
on a European and Global Green level. We would be keen to connect GPEW with the
various international solidarity campaigns that exist in the trade union
movement, and develop our pre-existing support further for the Kurdish
community. We would like to meet with GPTU if elected and discuss further how
this could be done.
ERWIN SCHAEFER
I am fully in agreement that the Green Party needs to
maintain strong links with the Trade Unions; we should be the party highlighting
the potential for Green jobs, work in solidarity with progressive
movements to resist austerity measures and make the Green Party a
welcoming place for people who identify as working class.
It is absurd that we will have to spend unnecessary energy and
create entirely avoidable friction to try and accommodate the many
deserving groups, such as trade union links, Greens of Colour,
disability groups, seniors, animal welfare, women's rights, international
links, etc in a new unsuitable format. A marginally quorate vote has
created unintended consequences that will have to be debated in GPEx and will
rumble through future conferences, wasting valuable time and efforts that could
be much better used in actually achieving measurable goals confronting the
climate crisis or pointing out the damaging policies that will be actioned by
the current government.
I pledge to work towards the goal of achieving fair representation
within the party's governance bodies for groups that are important to our
members, very much including the trade union movement. If this
means making amendments to the Holistic Review in light of the problems
arising, then so be it.
LOUIS WILLIAMS
So back in Scunthorpe Conference I was one of those that proposed a whole raft of amendments to attempt to see the Holistic Review/Transition Team's proposals even workable with Standing Orders Committee. The amendments suggested being the documents they needed for the proposed constitution to even be accepted at Conference - all of these not accepted.
So I've seen how the reorganisation has been poorly handled, using now what I believe is an outdated mandate to push it through. Becoming a top-down approach in a bottom-up party. It is something that has been splitting GPEx at a time when we need GPEx working together to be a democratic and effective Green Party that England and Wales needs. We are at a real crisis point for the Climate Emergency, Social Justice and errosion of Democracy across the world.
With this comes the need for a Just Transition that leaves nobody
behind. This means working with our Trade Unions, with our Trade Union Liaison
and all working people across England and Wales. For this, we need to
reevaluate if the mandate for the Holistic Review is still even active, or
wanted for that matter.
MOLLY SCOTT CATO
As a lifelong union member I think it's vital that we improve relationships with trade unions and help them become stronger supporters of the transition to sustainability. I'm quite confused by the process around changing the constitution and deeply worried that some proposals seemed intended to undermine the democracy that needs to lie at the heart of our party. For me, it is also a clear objective that the main bodies running the party can make swift and effective decisions - and at present that isn't happening. I think it is vital that the interests of trade union members in our party, as well as those of our various liberation groups, are fully represented in the decision-making structures. True democracy demands nothing less.
MATTHEW HULL and PAUL
VALENTINE
"As committed and experienced trade unionists, and members of the Green Party Trade Union group, we strongly agree that getting rid of the position of Trade Union Liaison Officer would be a calamitous error for the party.
Paul has been Trade Union Liaison Officer since 2018, and has done great work to build vibrant, lasting relationships with trade unionists. We've seen recently how powerful trade unions can be in defending and upholding workers' rights, when unions managed to force the government to implement and then expand its furlough scheme earlier this year to mitigate some of the most extreme poverty. This work is never over - and this brutal Tory government will never do enough for workers - but unions are a vital line of defence for working people.
All Greens should see unions, and the work of the Trade Union Liaison Officer, as absolutely central to our political strategy. Growing support for radical Green policies like Universal Basic Income among trade unions, including the Musicians' Union, the creative professionals' union Equity, and more is proof that unions are powerful allies of ecosocialists like us. Most of all, trade unionists can leverage our power to force a just transition away from fossil capitalism and without union muscle winning a just transition may be impossible.
If elected to the Green Party Executive, Paul & Matthew will fight tooth and nail to keep the post of Trade Union Liaison Officer. We will not support any reorganisation which eliminates it, and we will campaign to ensure it remains, by using our time in post to demonstrate exactly how powerful and positive it can be. In addition, we want to explore opportunities to ensure that the Green Party Trade Union group is represented on any Council or similar governing body of the party, reflecting how crucial grassroots worker organising is to achieving the Green Party's political objectives."
SIAN BERRY and JONATHON BARTLEY
We agree that workers’ rights and the jobs, income and inequality crisis are a major issue that means a real focus from the Green Party is needed in our campaigning and the work our elected Greens do in councils, assemblies and in Parliament. This also means a strong voice is needed for the GPTU Group in all that we do. As co-leaders we are keen to work with you to make sure the party is at the forefront of campaigning on this during the current crisis and as we move towards a green recovery.
Your specific question is a very timely one to ask in the light of upcoming debates about the new constitution, and we hope the GPTU will be making proposals for such an amendment to be debated if the suggested special conference is approved at Autumn conference. It is for members to decide what amendments to make to what was passed in the Holistic Review referendum, but we are open to hearing these arguments and will listen with an open mind, as we have done with the Young Greens who have a similar perspective on retaining a current dedicated post.
The Holistic Review proposals were passed by conference and involve a significant change in our governance, with the proposed Political Executive shifting to a political governance rather than role-based function (which is now out of date since we are a larger party with staff taking on much of the work the volunteer executive did in earlier times). The proposals, based on this principle, currently do not include any role-based elected posts, with representation for affiliated groups reserved for places on the new Council instead.
Our view on the question you raise is not fixed but currently leans towards the opinion that GPTU should be campaigning for strong commitments to represent workers’ rights and other trade union concerns from all members standing for election to the new Political Executive and also selecting candidates to stand for the executive non-portfolio places from among GPTU members who would benefit from campaigning on their behalf from members of the group. This would ensure a strong voice for you without replicating the current situation, where one role/person has effectively a taxing voluntary job that other members of the executive can legitimately leave to them, without embedding this work more closely into our wider plans and campaigns. However, we also think recent TU Liaison Officers on GPEx have made huge efforts and have been really effective, so would listen and be open to arguments for them to continue in a similar role if amendments are put to the special conference.
No comments:
Post a Comment