Wednesday, 18 December 2019

Sylvia Pankhurst Everything is Possible film screening

TUC LESE Women’s Rights Committee Presents
Sylvia Pankhurst Everything is Possible film screening
A unique opportunity to view this film about the campaigns and political impact of suffragette and revolutionary Sylvia Pankhurst
With Introduction by Mary Davis author of Sylvia Pankhurst: A Life in Radical Politics and member of the Sylvia Pankhurst Committee
  All monies donated will go to the Sylvia Pankhurst Statue Fund
A statue in London for Sylvia will represent Sylvia’s commitment to peace and her fight against racism and imperialism, her work with trade unions, fighting for the impoverished working class in the East End of London, and her campaign for votes for women.
Thursday 9 January 2020, 5.00pm until 7.00pm
TUC Congress House, Great Russell Street, London WC1B 3LS
Nibbles and refreshments from 5.00pm
Raffle tickets on sale
Payment on the door minimum £5.00 employed and £4.00 unemployed and retired
Open invitation to all trade unionists and supporters
Please confirm attendance: lese@tuc.org.uk or 020 7467 1218 

Sunday, 15 December 2019

Defend low-paid workers standing up to Boris Johnson's lies

Defend low-paid workers standing up to Boris Johnson's lies

by IWGB
Lawyers: Independent Workers Union of Great Britain
United Kingdom

The IWGB is the leading union for precarious and low-paid workers. We have won several landmark cases against so-called "gig economy" companies, including Uber, Addison Lee and CitySprint.
24
days to go
£5,275
pledged of £8,000 target from 162 pledges
Your card will only be charged if the case meets its target of £8,000 by Jan. 09, 2020, 6 a.m.
In October, migrant workers faced a terrible prospect: stand up to Boris Johnson and his threats of a no-deal Brexit, or face the risk of having some of their most basic rights stripped away.
Three precarious workers -- Maritza, Wilson and Alex -- teamed up with the IWGB and chose to fight back. In the face of repeated statements by Johnson that he would not extend the Brexit deadline beyond 31 October, they filed a claim with the High Court to force the government to abide by the law and seek an extension. A few days later, Boris Johnson went back on his commitment and agreed with the European Union to move the deadline to 31 January. After which, the workers withdrew their claim.
Now, government lawyers are arguing that because the claim was withdrawn, the claimants are liable to cover the government's legal costs of at least £8,000.
A no-deal Brexit would have put many of these workers' most basic rights at risk, not to mention, the many employment rights that are based in EU law. The IWGB has brought a number of high-profile cases which rely on EU law, including a £1m holiday pay claim against NHS contractor The Doctors Laboratory (TDL).
These precarious workers, who were forced to take action to avoid the terrible consequences a no-deal brexit, are now being punished by the government for having the temerity to take a stand.
Like claimant Maritza Castillo Calle said:
“Precarious migrant workers like myself have been terrified by the prospect of a no-deal Brexit and the impact it could have on our most basic rights. We decided to take action to protect our communities, but now because Boris Johonson lied about his intention to not seek an extension, we are being asked to pay thousands of pounds. By handing us this bill, it's clear that this government for the rich is trying to intimidate ourselves and other working class people from ever daring to hold it to account.”
This attempt to intimidate those that try and challenge the government is in line with the Conservative party's proposed manifesto pledge to explore changes to the judicial review process, which many fear will further limit ordinary citizens’ ability to challenge government policies.
Labour shadow chancellor John McDonnell, who supports the crowdfunder says:
"This crowdfunder goes to the heart of why Boris is unfit to be Prime Minister. The PM lied, low paid workers and their union bravely took action to hold him to account, the PM backtracked, and is now vindictively pursuing them for legal costs. Low paid workers standing up for their rights and the rule of law need to be supported, not attacked."
How much are we raising and why?
We have set an initial target of £8,000 which would cover the current costs the claimants are being held liable for, and a stretch target of £25,000 to protect the claimants from any additional costs. Due to Johnson's history of dishonesty, there is a risk the government increases the amount the workers are held liable for.
Any leftover funds will go to the IWGB legal department to support legal cases on behalf of low-paid workers.
Any help is massively appreciated and we thank you for your donation

Friday, 29 November 2019

HE strikes / Day of action for disability equality/Pregnancyand maternity rights for members in casualised work

Extracts from UCU branch officers' update: 29 November 2019
. HE strikes continue next week
A round-up of the handy links for branches as strikes enter week 2.
·  The FAQs and legal advice for the industrial action. This should be the first port-of-call for any queries. The FAQs have been prepared in collaboration with expert employment lawyers. If you are still unclear or you need to add to this list please contact Matt Waddup directly here. New questions will be added as they arise, so if your query is not covered please do send them through.
·  Additional guidance on working to contract and a briefing aimed specifically at migrant staff, again produced for UCU in cooperation with our legal advisors.
·  An index of the rallies, marches and other events being organised at each branch during the strike period.
·  Suggested out of office text for strike action and action short of a strike.
·  UCU general secretary Jo Grady hosted a live Q&A session last Friday - if you missed it, the video is available here.
·  There is also a master list of the institutions taking action.
·  There is a call to support striking colleagues by donating to the fighting fund. To make a donation, click here. The larger the fund is, the stronger the message we send to our employers that we will not capitulate.

2. Day of action for disability equality: Wednesday 4 December 2019
Members are encouraged to campaign and raise awareness of the inequality around disabled workers in education. Branches taking part in the higher education strikes can request materials to campaign on the disability pay gap at their institution.
UCU977.html | UCU977.rtf
·  Request deliveries of leaflets and posters by email here. In order to deliver these in time orders must be received by 12pm on Monday 2 December at the latest.
·  Materials are also available for download on the day of action page here.

6. Pregnancy and maternity rights for members in casualised work
UCU is working with UK charity Maternity Action on a project to raise awareness of the impact of casualisation on pregnant workers and new mothers and are asking reps to complete a short online survey.
UCU985.html | UCU985.rtf

Monday, 25 November 2019

Green Party Trade Union Group sends a message of solidarity to UCU members in Universities


Green Party Trade Union Group sends a message of solidarity to UCU members in Universities who are taking strike action over pay, pensions, casualisation and workloads. If we are to have the green New Deal that we need to combat climate change and build a low carbon economy, Higher Education has a vital role to pay and its workforce must be properly treated and rewarded by their employers.
University strikes ON after universities refuse to deal with pensions, pay and working conditions

21 November 2019 | last updated: 22 November 2019
Eight days of strike action at 60 UK universities will begin on Monday as UCU accused universities of being 'all spin and no substance' in their response to disputes over pensions, pay and working conditions.
Earlier this week, UCU accused universities of playing games after their representatives refused to even discuss pay. The union said things were no better at talks yesterday  over changes to the Universities Superannuation Scheme (USS), where their representatives failed to make a serious offer.
UCU said it feared that universities had learnt nothing from last year's dispute, when campuses were brought to a standstill by unprecedented levels of strike action.
Last month, UCU members backed strike action in two disputes, one on changes to the USS pension scheme and one on universities' failure to make improvements on pay, equality, casualisation and workloads. Overall, 79% of UCU members who voted backed strike action in the ballot over changes to pensions. In the ballot on pay, equality, casualisation and workloads, 74% of members polled backed strike action. 
The union called on other vice-chancellors to follow the example of Professor Anthony Forster at the University of Essex, who recently acknowledged employers can afford to pay more for USS and should be doing more to avoid widespread disruption.
The union warned that if universities failed to make improved offers then further waves of strike action could follow in the new year, with even more staff taking part. UCU has said it is currently consulting with its branches at other universities about being balloted again to join further action.

As well as eight strike days from 25 November to Wednesday 4 December, UCU members will begin 'action short of a strike'. This involves things like working strictly to contract, not covering for absent colleagues and refusing to reschedule lectures lost to strike action.

UCU general secretary Jo Grady said: 'It is quite staggering that the employers have allowed things to get to this stage and done so little to avoid the upcoming disruption. Instead of engaging seriously with us over the various elements of the disputes, they have been all spin and no substance.

'Universities appear to have learnt nothing from last year's USS dispute, and are once again showing a dangerous level of complacency that completely underestimates the scale of anger amongst staff. Instead of wasting time playing games, they would do well to listen to people like Anthony Forster who have acknowledged that universities can afford to pay more to address these issues. It is time for university leaders to show some actual leadership.
'Students should be asking serious questions of their vice-chancellors and putting pressure on them to get their representatives back to the negotiating table with serious offers that address all the issues at stake. If universities don't change their tune, then next week's action could just be the start with further waves of strikes involving more staff in the new year.'


* UK universities affected by strike action from Monday 25 November
Both disputes (42):
1.     Aston University
2.     Bangor University
3.     Cardiff University
4.     University of Durham
5.     Heriot-Watt University
6.     Loughborough University
7.     Newcastle University
8.     The Open University
9.    The University of Bath
10.  The University of Dundee
11.  The University of Leeds
12.  The University of Manchester
13.  The University of Sheffield
14.  University of Nottingham
15.  The University of Stirling
16.  University College London
17.  The University of Birmingham
18.  The University of Bradford
29.  The University of Bristol
20.  The University of Cambridge
21.  The University of Edinburgh
22.  The University of Exeter
23.  The University of Essex
24.  The University of Glasgow
25.  The University of Lancaster
26.  The University of Leicester
27.  City University
28.  Goldsmiths College
39.  Queen Mary University of London
30.  Royal Holloway
31.  The University of Reading
32.  The University of Southampton
33.  The University of St Andrews
34.  Courtauld Institute of Art
35.  The University of Strathclyde
36.  The University of Wales
37.  The University of Warwick
38.  The University of York
49.  The University of Liverpool
40.  The University of Sussex
41.  The University of Ulster
42.  Queen's University Belfast
Pay and conditions dispute only (14):
1.     Bishop Grosseteste University
2.     Bournemouth University
3.     Edge Hill University
4.     Glasgow Caledonian University
5.     Glasgow School of Art
6.     Liverpool Hope University
7.     Liverpool Institute of Performing Arts
8.     Queen Margaret University, Edinburgh
9.     St Mary's University College, Belfast
10.  Roehampton University
11.  The University of Oxford
12.  Sheffield Hallam University
13.  The University of Brighton
14.  The University of Kent
USS pensions dispute only (4):
1.       Scottish Association of Marine Science
2.       The University of Aberdeen
3.       The University of East Anglia
4.       Institute for Development Studies


Disappointing to see bias in the latest Greener Jobs Alliance newsletter


Disappointing to see bias in the latest newsletter ( see 
http://www.greenerjobsalliance.co.uk/news/), towards Labour Green New Deal and not a comparison to how it compares with the Green New Deal


Normally I tweet the link to the Green Jobs Alliance, but won't be this time as I am disappointed that there is a clear bias towards the Labour Party policies relating to the environment, and you have not set out the Green Party's commitments to the environment alongside this.

 I am surprised that you didn't see fit to present a more balanced view by comparing Labour's Green commitments with those of the  Green Party.

Especially as the Labour Party are not showing their commitment to becoming Green through recent actions in Parliament:

119 Labour MP's voted to expand Heathrow Airport with a 3rd runway.

Labour Shadow Cabinet members have backed Nuclear - Sepember 2019
& a new coal mine in April 2019

Also Labour in their manifesto have not committed to zero carbon by 2030 and are not putting in enough funded infrastructure, compared to the Green Party's commitment of spending Overall.

The green party propose investing around £93 billion per year in our Green New Deal, with a further £80or so billion being spend on Universal Basic Income which will form part of the New Deal (empowering people to seize the opportunities created by the new green economy)
This combined Green New Deal investment, over ten years, will represent an investment of nearly £2 trillion in fighting the climate emergency.

So perhaps in order for people to understand the differences between these two Green Deals and not have one presented as being the solution - i.e. Labour's green new deal you should have given a more objective summary and outline of both parties' commitments to the environment in full!

Regards,

Andrea Carey Fuller
Green Party Candidate for Lewisham Deptford